Welcome
Ladies and Gents:

These forums are now closed and registration disabled.

Please join us at our new forum on Proboards. Our hope is that these new forums are more stable, provide more and better features, and allow continuation of the project forums in a safer, more secure, long term environment.

me3explorer.proboards.com

--The ME3Explorer Team

Testers Needed | Prep for v110 Stable Release

General news and announcements for ME3Explorer.

Re: Testers Needed | Prep for v110 Stable Release

Postby KFreon » 14 Apr 2016, 08:59

User avatar
KFreon
Toolset Developer
 
Posts: 1665
Joined: 16 Apr 2013, 00:57
Has thanked: 83 time
Have thanks: 520 time

Re: Testers Needed | Prep for v110 Stable Release

Postby Legioness58 » 14 Apr 2016, 13:28

I checked permissions and I am admin on all so nothing there. I do have the latest .NET framework installed. You have all been so responsive, I do appreciate it. I don't know what happened but it is not for lack of input from your team and every effort we all make is awesome. Thanks again!
Legioness58
User
 
Posts: 5
Joined: 04 Aug 2015, 22:04
Has thanked: 1 time
Have thanks: 0 time

Re: Testers Needed | Prep for v110 Stable Release

Postby giftfish » 14 Apr 2016, 13:42


We shall see, muuuhahahahha!!


EDIT: @K, I see also that we now have new changes for issue #313? Ack. Please don't fix any new issues at this point. We should only be fixing issues that existed back in rev748 -- that corresponds *only* to the issues tagged with the v110 milestone. If it isn't tagged with that, we're not dealing with it. Feature freeze, remember? :]

I'll add #313 to my list to test, but I'm now concerned that there are other changes I don't know about. Is there a list on Git of all changes added to these prebuilds since rev748? I need that information to know whether I've tested everything.


@Sir, if you read this before K and can access this info yourself -- or know where I can access that info -- please post here and let me know :)
User avatar
giftfish
Toolset Developer
 
Posts: 1247
Joined: 08 Jan 2016, 02:35
Has thanked: 129 time
Have thanks: 75 time

Re: Testers Needed | Prep for v110 Stable Release

Postby giftfish » 14 Apr 2016, 15:03

Okay, here's where we're at on the "final" prebuild:


--Fix for 313 works fine. Starts with the default name, but changes stick.
--We have another new issue related to the fix for 292. Unless we want to ignore it, we'll need another prebuild due to this issue.


In addition, once I have a list of all changes since 748 then I can cross-check that against what I've tested and see if there's anything I've missed :)
User avatar
giftfish
Toolset Developer
 
Posts: 1247
Joined: 08 Jan 2016, 02:35
Has thanked: 129 time
Have thanks: 75 time

Re: Testers Needed | Prep for v110 Stable Release

Postby SirCxyrtyx » 14 Apr 2016, 16:23

Well, based on what KFreon commited to github, these are the changes:
  • Fix for #313: Texplorer extract no longer forces hashes to be in filenames.
  • Rewrote file duplicate detection. File duplicates now included in TPFTools analysis.
User avatar
SirCxyrtyx
Toolset Lead
 
Posts: 345
Joined: 16 Apr 2014, 00:20
Has thanked: 28 time
Have thanks: 288 time

Re: Testers Needed | Prep for v110 Stable Release

Postby giftfish » 14 Apr 2016, 18:34

SirCxyrtyx wrote:Well, based on what KFreon commited to github, these are the changes:
  • Fix for #313: Texplorer extract no longer forces hashes to be in filenames.
  • Rewrote file duplicate detection. File duplicates now included in TPFTools analysis.

Hm.

Well, that's a good sign. But, I know he's included other fixes, like for the dimension bug that's fixed with this prebuild. I'm guessing this is the stuff that's only in his branch? Can we see all the changes to his branch? I assume that's harder to track down?
User avatar
giftfish
Toolset Developer
 
Posts: 1247
Joined: 08 Jan 2016, 02:35
Has thanked: 129 time
Have thanks: 75 time

Re: Testers Needed | Prep for v110 Stable Release

Postby KFreon » 14 Apr 2016, 21:27

Dimensions issue was that duplicates weren't included in anaylsis, and thus defaulting to the first failure mode.
Musta forgotten to add that to the commit message...
User avatar
KFreon
Toolset Developer
 
Posts: 1665
Joined: 16 Apr 2013, 00:57
Has thanked: 83 time
Have thanks: 520 time

Re: Testers Needed | Prep for v110 Stable Release

Postby giftfish » 14 Apr 2016, 22:03

KFreon wrote:Dimensions issue was that duplicates weren't included in anaylsis, and thus defaulting to the first failure mode.
Musta forgotten to add that to the commit message...

That's fine, I know I've tested it. I just need to know if there's anything else I missed. #313 wasn't on my radar since it wasn't a part of r748. I just happened to see it.

Also, we don't *need* to fix the new autofix-duplicates thing. I'd rather be done with testing these pre-revs honestly. And the more things you change, the better chance other things will get broken. I just needed to know what the intent was and if you wanted to change it.
User avatar
giftfish
Toolset Developer
 
Posts: 1247
Joined: 08 Jan 2016, 02:35
Has thanked: 129 time
Have thanks: 75 time

Re: Testers Needed | Prep for v110 Stable Release

Postby giftfish » 20 Apr 2016, 21:22

Closing and locking thread.

We are ready for the stable, boys and girls :D
User avatar
giftfish
Toolset Developer
 
Posts: 1247
Joined: 08 Jan 2016, 02:35
Has thanked: 129 time
Have thanks: 75 time

Previous

Return to Announcements

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

suspicion-preferred